Former White House Counter-Terrorism Czar Richard
Clarke has managed to do something that defies modern political gravity.
He has
stayed in
the news, hour after hour and day after day. He
was hurled many days ago into the maelstrom of the 24-hour news cycle,
which
reports
one moment on an incredibly important story, flings
that story out beyond the Oort Cloud the next moment, and that story
is never
seen again.
Clarke, somehow, has managed to maintain his
position at the top of the news despite this process we mistakenly call
'journalism'
for longer than any other ten major recent
stories combined.
There are several reasons for this. First of all,
Clarke's accusations are damning. According to him, the Bush administration
ignored
the threat
of al Qaeda terrorism completely. After the
attacks of September 11, the administration became obsessed with attacking
Iraq,
despite
the fact that every intelligence organization in
America was telling them Iraq had nothing to do with it. Clarke maintains
that
the
war in Iraq
is a dangerous distraction from the defense of
the nation, a political war that has nothing to do with making America
safer,
and
one that
has cost us terribly in blood and treasure. Given
the fact that Clarke was physically in the White House for all this,
and that
he
has been
in the anti-terrorism business since the days of
Ronald Reagan, his accusations have long, sharp teeth.
There is also the fact that Clarke apologized for
September 11. In the context of a White House that has battled the assembly
of a
September
11 investigation for two years, a White House
that has slapped down every plea from the family members of those who
died on
September
11 to get this investigation rolling, a White
House that tried at one point to put the investigation into the slippery
hands of
Henry Kissinger,
a White House that has adamantly refused
to hand over relevant data about September 11 to the commission they
never
wanted to
see in the first place, a White House that won't
allow National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice to testify publicly
before
this
commission
despite her central role in the administration,
a National Security Advisor that would dance the Macarena on the Capitol
dome
if it could
get her out of giving that testimony because
she knows she will get clobbered with her own words, and finally a White
House
that never
got around to saying they were sorry to the
families of the September 11 victims, in the context of all that, Richard
Clarke's
heartfelt
apology to those families instantly became the
stuff of political legend.
Another reason Clarke has stayed in the news is
because he does not stand alone. Had he been the only person to come
forth with
savage criticism
of George W. Bush and his administration,
Karl Rove would have called out the dogs, and Clarke would have found
himself
selling Amway outside of McMurdo Sound before St.
Patrick's Day. Fortunately for Mr. Clarke, and for the truth, he has
joined a
long and
prestigious line of people who have come forward
to bear witness against this White House:
* Tom Maertens, who was National Security Council
director for nuclear non-proliferation for both the Clinton and Bush
White House.
Maertens'
own words tell the tale: "Clarke was a colleague
of mine for 15 months in the White House, under both Bill Clinton and
George
W. Bush.
Subsequently, I moved to the U.S. State Department
as deputy coordinator for counterterrorism, and worked with him and
his
staff before
and after 9/11. The Bush administration did
ignore the threat of terrorism. It was focused on tax cuts, building
a ballistic
missile
system, withdrawing from the ABM Treaty and
rejecting the Kyoto Protocol. Clarke's gutsy insider recounting of events
related to
9/11 is
an important public service. From my perspective,
the Bush administration has practiced the most cynical, opportunistic
form of
politics
I witnessed in my 28 years in government:
hijacking legitimate American outrage and patriotism over 9/11 to conduct
a
pre-ordained
war against Saddam Hussein."
* Roger Cressey, Clarke's former deputy. Cressey backs
up one of the most damning charges that has been leveled against the
administration
by Clarke: They blew past al Qaeda after the
9/11 attacks, focusing instead on Iraq. Cressey is one of four eyewitnesses
to
an exchange
between Clarke and Bush which took place in the
White House Situation Room on September 12, 2001. Bush pressed
Clarke three
times on September 12 to find evidence that
Iraq was responsible for the attacks. According to his book, 'Against
All
Enemies,'
Clarke protested that al-Qaida, and not Iraq, was
responsible. Bush angrily ordered him to "'look into Iraq, Saddam,'"
and then
left the
room. According to Cressey, Condoleezza Rice was
also a witness to this exchange. The word from administration officials
is that
Rice can't
seem to remember it. This, among others, is a
reason Rice is refusing to testify publicly before the September 11
commission.
* Donald Kerrick, a three-star General who served as
deputy National Security Advisor under Clinton, and stayed for several
months in
the Bush
White House. According to a report by Sidney
Blumenthal from March 25, Kerrick wrote Stephen Hadley, his replacement
in the
White House,
a two-page memo. "It was classified," Kerrick
told Blumenthal. "I said they needed to pay attention to al-Qaida
and
counterterrorism.
I said we were going to be struck again.
We didn't know where or when. They never once asked me a question nor
did I
see them
having a serious discussion about it. They didn't
feel it was an imminent threat the way the Clinton administration did.
Hadley
did not
respond to my memo. I know he had it. I agree with
Dick that they saw those problems through an Iraqi prism. But the evidence
wasn't there."
Hadley has since become a White House front
man in the attacks against Rickard Clarke.
* Paul O'Neill, former Treasury Secretary for George
W. Bush. O'Neill was afforded a position on the National Security Council
because
of his job as Treasury Secretary, and sat in on the
Iraq invasion planning sessions which were taking place months before
the
attacks
of September 11. "It was all about finding a way to
do it," says O'Neill. "That was the tone of it. The president
saying 'Go find
me a
way to do
this.'" O'Neill describes the process of
decision-making between Bush and his people as being "like a blind
man in a roomful of
deaf people."
Pulitzer prizewinning journalist Ron Suskind
captured O'Neill's views in a new book titled 'The Price of Loyalty.'
"From the
very first
instance, it was about Iraq," says Suskind about
his interviews with O'Neill and his review of 19,000 pages of documentary
evidence
provided by O'Neill. "It was about what we can do
to change this regime. Day one, these things were laid and sealed."
* Joseph Wilson, the former ambassador and career
diplomat who received lavish praise from the first President Bush for
his work in
Iraq before
the first Gulf War. Wilson was the man
dispatched in February 2002 to Niger to see if charges that Iraq was
seeking uranium
from that
nation to make nuclear bombs had any merit. He
investigated, returned, and informed the CIA, the State Department,
the office
of the National
Security Advisor and the office of Vice
President Cheney that the charges were without merit. Eleven months
later, George
W. Bush
used the Niger uranium claim in his State of the
Union address to scare the cheese out of everyone, despite the fact
that the
claim had
been irrefutably debunked. Wilson went public,
exposing this central bit of evidence to support the Iraq invasion as
the lie it
was. A few
days later, Wilson's wife came under attack from
the White House, whose agents used press proxies to destroy her career
in
the CIA
as a warning to Wilson and anyone else who might
come forward. For the record, Wilson's wife was a deep-cover agent running
a
network
which worked to keep weapons of mass destruction
out of the hands of terrorists. The irony is palpable.
* Greg Thielmann, former Director of the Office of
Strategic, Proliferation, and Military Issues in the State Department.
Thielmann,
like
Ambassador
Wilson, was involved in investigating whether
the Niger uranium claims had any merit. Thielmann told Newsweek at the
beginning
of June 2003 that the State Department's Bureau
of Intelligence and Research had concluded the documents used to support
the Niger
uranium claims were "garbage." In fact, they were
crude forgeries. Thielmann was stunned to see Bush use the claims in
his
State of
the Union address eleven months after the charge
had been dispensed with as nonsense. "When I saw that, it really
blew me
away,"
Thielmann told Newsweek. He watched Bush use the
claim and said, "Not that stupid piece of garbage. My thought was,
how did
that get
into the speech?"
* Karen Kwiatkowski, a Lt. Colonel in the Air Force
and a career Pentagon officer. Kwiatkowski worked in the office of Undersecretary
for Policy
Douglas Feith, and worked specifically with the
Office of Special Plans. Kwiatkowski's own words tell her story: "From
May
2002 until
February 2003, I observed firsthand the
formation of the Pentagon's Office of Special Plans and watched the
latter stages of
the
neoconservative
capture of the policy-intelligence nexus in
the run-up to the invasion of Iraq. I saw a narrow and deeply flawed
policy
favored
by some executive appointees in the Pentagon used
to manipulate and pressurize the traditional relationship between
policymakers
in the Pentagon and U.S. intelligence
agencies. I witnessed neoconservative agenda bearers within OSP usurp
measured
and carefully
considered assessments, and through
suppression and distortion of intelligence analysis promulgate what
were in fact
falsehoods
to both Congress and the executive office of the
president."
* Rand Beers, who served the Bush administration on
the National Security Council at the White House as a special assistant
to the
President
for combating terrorism. Mr. Beers served in
government for more than 30 years working in international narcotics
and law
enforcement
affairs, intelligence, and counter-terrorism.
He worked for the National Security Council under presidents Reagan,
BushSr.,
Clinton. Because of his position, Beers saw everything. In a June 25,
2003,
interview with Ted Koppel on Nightline, Beers reported that
the administration
was failing dramatically to defend the
United States against terrorism. According to Beers, al Qaeda presented
a far
greater
threat to America than Hussein and Iraq, and that
the Iraq war was a terrible and unnecessary distraction from what was
truly
needed to
keep the nation safe.
Rogue journalist Hunter S. Thompson, in a Rolling
Stone article from July 4 1973 titled 'Fear and Loathing in Washington:
The Boys in
the Bag,'
described the looming sense of doomed finality
which surrounded the Nixon White House after the existence of recorded
Oval
Office conversations
became exposed. The Nixon White House
had tried everything to that point to fend off the Watergate scandal:
They
denied everything,
then tried to pay off the central
figures, then fired a bunch of people, denied everything again, and
finally released
edited
transcripts
of the White House tapes in an effort to stem
the tide that was about to flood them out of power.
"There are a hundred or more people wandering around
Washington today," wrote Thompson, "who have heard the 'real
stuff,' as they
put it -
and despite their professional caution when the
obvious question arises, there is one reaction they all feel free to
agree on:
that
nobody who
felt shocked, depressed or angry after reading
the edited White House transcripts should ever be allowed to hear the
actual
tapes, except
under heavy sedation or locked in the trunk
of a car. Only a terminal cynic, they say, can listen for any length
of time to
the
real stuff
without feeling a compulsion to do something
like drive down to the White House and throw a bag of live rats over
the fence."
Richard Clarke, Tom Maertens, Roger Cressey, Donald
Kerrick, Paul O'Neill, Joseph Wilson, Greg Thielmann, Karen Kwiatkowski
and
Rand Beers
all heard and saw the real stuff happening in
this Bush White House. Wilson has a book coming out in May, in which
he will
name the
White House operatives who destroyed his wife's car
eer. There will be more books, from more people, and the 24-hour news
cycle will
continue to ride this tiger.
These people are telling the world about the real
stuff. The Bush/Cheney Re-Election Axis is terrified, and the Secret
Service detail
guarding
the White House perimeter might want to cowboy up
in preparation for a rain of rat bags coming over that fence.
back
|