Send your rant

The News

Bush's advance knowledge of 9-11

Retail stores that leave their doors open in the summer heat.

Should we expect the same level of quality from computers as we do our cars?

Why is there such a low level of quality control with software companies?

Clear Channel is one step away from Facism

Holiday lights in the trees

back

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

Retail stores that leave their doors open in the summer heat.


I've got a problem when I see retail stores leaving their front doors wide open on hot summer days with their cold air pouring out on to the sidewalk. I assume the reason they do this is to entice window shoppers to come in and enjoy their cool air and buy their products. Some say there is an energy crisis in California. One could look at the problem in California as a foreshadow of things to come. Consider the fact that we have limited fossel fuel resources. These same resources are what generate the power to cool off our apartments and stores. Why should we dileberately waste the limited resources we have. It doesn't seem wise when you think that someday they will be depleted. So all I have to say on this is close the God damn doors and turn the thermostat down to a reasonable level. When you think about these stores wasting all this money on their power bill how do you think they offset these costs? Do you think maybe they are passing these costs along to you the consumer?
Jevou

list of rants
back

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Should we demand the same level of quality from computers as we do our cars?


Your car IS a computer, complete with processing chips and an OS. If every
tenth time you popped in a CD (killer app) while at the same time running
the air-conditioning and windshield wipers, and your car stalled, you
wouldn't stand for it, nobody would! If the car was brand new, it would
(literally and legally) be considered a lemon and you would be entitled to a
refund or a replacement.

Or, switch 'website' with 'tires' and 'browser' with 'road surface'. It
would NOT be acceptable if your tires worked fine on the highway, but EVERY
time you hit those ridges right before a toll booth (we'll call them
'netscape') you spun wildly out of control and crashed into the booth (well,
your Ford Explorer might).

And say you get a new CD player for the car. It would never occur to you
that if you installed it by the book, and used it correctly, that it would
not be compatible with your system (the car), especially if the box it came
in claimed that it is made for your car (as 3rd-party software apps claim
they are WIN98 compatible, but then never work 100%).

Alright, here's a good one... Everything seems to be working fine, but
every time you play track 3 from Cat Stevens' Tea for the Tillerman, your
headlights, brakes, and airbags fail (FYI...all computer controlled these
days). How acceptable would that be if you happened to be driving through
the mountains at 3a.m.? While your car is running through 'scandisk', you
drive helplessly off the side of the mountain!

You could drive a piece of garbage Kia from here to California and
back..several times, and as long as you kept the tank full of gas, there
would be no reason to shut off and restart (or reboot) the car. But a
top-o-the-line Sony VAIO locks up every day!

Now, sometimes you've been working for a while, and you've got a couple of
apps running simultaneously, then you hit ctrl+p to print, and nothing
happens, or the printer just spits out garbled text and symbols. If you
shift up to 'p' (park), do you ever really question whether the car will
stay put? Of course not, but if the pc doesn't print, you shut everything
down, reboot, reopen the app and attempt to print again. If that doesn't
work you reinstall the printer drivers and pray, and that's just the way it
is.

If you had no confidence that 'p' would safely secure your new car in park,
you wouldn't disassemble the gearbox and then hope it would be better next
time...you'd freak out and park the car on top of the guy who sold it to
you!

Cars, PCs. Both are complicated, expensive, ubiquitous products on which
our lives and businesses both depend. Somehow we've been duped into
believing that software and PCs are working fine when they are consistantly
NOT working fine.

In the sixties, Ralph Nader came along and told us that no matter what GM
(pretend GM is MS now) said, the rear-engine Corvair was a deathtrap and not
to drive them, and soon the car was history. He did the same in the
seventies with the Pinto. He didn't wait until 95% of us were driving
Pintos and Corvairs (like Windows) and blowing up all over the road!

The closest we have to Ralph for PCs is Linus from Linux, but he wants us
all to invent our own custom-made OS. What if instead of recalling the
Pinto, Ford exchanged your Pinto with a box full of parts and suggested that
you build your own car?
LB
list of rants
back

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Why is there such a low level of quality control with software companies?

WE LET THEM!
Early on, we let THEM set the rules. And as I said, Ralph
Nader did not wait until 95% of the automobile consumers were driving
corvairs and pintos before he took a stand.

Software and hardware companies started out with the attitude of "we'll let
you 'consumers' in on our technology, but you'll never understand it as well
as us, so just buy it and keep quiet."

MS operating systems have always had problems, but they enjoyed
unprecedented growth for years, in spite of the fact that their product
wasn't all that great. The same goes for Adobe, Corel, Intuit, and
countless other companies that told us that they were the "industry
standard", and before we knew it, they were!

By the way, MACs suck too, but many of their users are elitist snobs who
would be hard pressed to admit that their systems crash as often as they do.

Usually the market takes care of these cases, by NOT buying the product. We
all keep buying the product, when really we should have maybe bought the
first version, and then received from MS all of the subsequent versions at
no charge as fixes.

PEOPLE ACTUALLY GIVE THE TECH SUPPORT DEPARTMENTS CREDIT CARD NUMBERS..
VOLUNTARILY, SO THEY COULD HELP THEM GET THEIR PRODUCT BACK UP AND RUNNING!
WHAT THE FUCK!

Sure you can get patches for your software apps, if you can find them, after
you have run into the problem that destroyed a day's worth of work...or
worse. But usually we all seem to put up with fatal errors and system
crashes until the updated version is released, for which we pay additional
hundreds of dollars.

How long would your company survive if you made defective, $300.00 baby
strollers that collapsed unexplainably as you rolled down the sidewalk, and
you as the CEO just assumed that all of your customers would shell out
another $300.00 every time you came out with a replacement model that would
hopefully not mame your child?

Automobiles, washing machines, building materials, these all have
regulations that have to be adhered to. If a company produces wall
insulation with a specific R factor, it sure as shit better meet that spec,
or its free insulation all around, and the company may be forced out of
business.

Windows 3.1 was problem-riddled OS. But no worry, in 1995, Microsoft LET us
all shell out $100.00 for the upgrade. AN UPGRADE THAT CRASHED SYSTEMS LEFT
AND RIGHT!

The bottom line... it's all our own fault. We've dug a hole in which we can
only tread, but hardly climb out of. Now where did I put my abacus and
straight edge?
LB
list of rants
back

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Clear Channel is one step away from Facism

Read this article first...

It seems Clear Channel is opening pandoras box of fears. Just by creating this list they are walking in the footsteps of the Nazi book burnings. The "Islamic" fundemental terrorists hate us because of our freedoms. By distributing this list of "bad" music Clear Channel is playing right into the terrorist hands. Art, film and music are mere reflections of todays world. Artists are trying to shine a light on some of the worlds atrocities. They are not the ones creating the problem.

I say boycott Clear Channel stations!

Jevou
list of rants
back

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Holiday lights in the trees


I don't understand why every winter the City hires people to put lights in the trees and then every spring they spend more money to have them cut the lights out of the trees. This is not only a waste of materials, the lights, since they cut them instead of reusing them. It is also a terrible waste of man power. Why don't they just put the lights up once and leave them in the trees all year round?


Jevou
list of rants
back

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bush's advance knowledge of 9-11


Yesterday I gave our pres, W, a pass on the current controversy. I doubt that he would let 9-11 happen if he really had specific knowledge of the event in advance. If for no other reason, why would he want to start a war with our oil suppliers? But really I just think that W is an idiot, and not an evil fuck like his dad.

It is semi-common knowledge that FDR probably looked the other way prior to the attack on Pearl Harbor. He needed a reason to get involved in the war, and the "America 1st" leaning public wouldn't let him do it unless we were personally attacked. But let's not fool ourselves into thinking that one can compare W to FDR.

Then today, W's boss, Cheney, comes out and pulls the "how dare you question this administration" card once again! To paraphrase, he said something like this, "People should be very careful about calling for investigations..." He aimed his remarks towards the Democrats, though several Republicans are calling for an investigation as well.

This is a party (the Republicans) that found it SO IMPORTANT to spend sixty million dollars to investigate an old, rinky-dink, Arkansas land deal that went bust, and then morphed that hunt into the whole dig into Clinton's personal life. Neither of which could hardly be described as affecting national security, or likely to cause the World Trade Towers to implode.

Now there are valid questions regarding the communication breakdown between the CIA, the FBI, and W. And the administration's stand is that nobody should be questioning them!

The difference here is that today's issue is actually an issue that affects everybody, and it is the kind of thing that we should be looking into, regardless of who is in office.

LB
list of rants
back

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The News

I was just watching one of the cable news channels (it doesn't really matter which one, they're all pretty much the same). The moderator was interviewing a two person panel. The topic was about how Starbucks Coffee chairman, Howard Schultz made some comments at his synagogue about how the fight for Palestinian statehood has undertones of antisemitism. I applaud him for having the courage for finally pointing that out (not that Statehood isn't a legitmate issue but there is a lot of Jewish hatred there) but that is not my rant. I have a real problem with this particular format on all but one channel, WTTW. The common problem with all of these are that the moderator is NOT doing his job of moderating. He's more like a referee at a fight (and not even a good ref). This phenomenon is not much unlike a Jerry Springer show. That's what all these programs are, a word fight. When it really gets going nobody hears anybody over all the yelling. A responsible journalist/moderator would not allow the parties to speak over one another when it is clearly someone's turn to speak.



Jevou
list of rants
back